{"id":829,"date":"2015-04-09T07:00:42","date_gmt":"2015-04-09T14:00:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/?p=829"},"modified":"2024-04-26T11:23:41","modified_gmt":"2024-04-26T18:23:41","slug":"phytophthora-hedraiandra-de-cock-man-int-veld","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/?p=829","title":{"rendered":"Phytophthora hedraiandra de Cock & Man in\u2019t Veld"},"content":{"rendered":"
California Pest Rating for<\/strong><\/h5>\n
Phytophthora hedraiandra <\/em><\/strong>de Cock & Man in\u2019t Veld<\/strong><\/h5>\n
Pest\u00a0Rating: B<\/strong><\/h5>\n
\n
PEST RATING PROFILE<\/strong><\/h5>\n
Initiating Event: <\/strong><\/h5>\n

Recently, Suzanne Latham, CDFA plant pathologist, detected Phytophthora hedraiaindra<\/em> in Arctostaphylos pumila<\/em> samples that were collected from a nursery in Monterey County during an inspection related to an earlier detection of P. tentaculata<\/em>.\u00a0\u00a0 In December 2014, the pathogen had also been detected in Arctostaphylos<\/em> plants propagated in a nursery in Alameda County.\u00a0 This nursery had requested the CDFA Plant Pathology Laboratory to test some Arctostaphylos<\/em> plants for Phytophthora<\/em> spp. before they were to be released for planting.\u00a0 The nursery baited the water flow-through the potted plants with Rhododendron and Oregano tissue that were provided by the CDFA Lab and returned the same for analysis.\u00a0 Suzanne Latham, CDFA plant pathologist, confirmed the detection of Phytophthora hedraiandra<\/em> in culture from Rhododendron leaf baits.\u00a0 The collection of official samples and trace forward investigations are currently in process related to this detection.\u00a0 Phytophthora hedraiandra<\/em> was initially detected in San Francisco, California 2013 on Arctopstaphylos<\/em> plants.\u00a0 Arctopstaphylos<\/em> native plants extracted from a natural site in San Francisco were propagated at three different nurseries in San Francisco, Berkley, and Santa Cruz.\u00a0 Similar to the 2014 incident, the water flow-through of potted Arctopstaphylos<\/em> plants was baited with plant tissue which was then sent to the CDFA Lab for testing.\u00a0 Cheryl Blomquist, CDFA plant pathologist, identified P. hedraiandra<\/em> in the samples.\u00a0 The detection was confirmed by the USDA Lab in Beltsville, Maryland. All potted plants were eventually destroyed.\u00a0 Phytophthora hedraiandra<\/em> currently has a Q rating that is herein reassessed for the proposal of a permanent rating.<\/p>\n

History & Status:<\/strong><\/h5>\n

Background<\/strong><\/span>: Since the discovery of Phytophthora ramorum<\/em>, causal organism for the Sudden Oak Disease, there has been an increase of surveys throughout the world, for Phytophthora<\/em> spp. which resulted in the identification of several new species, including P. hedraiandra<\/em>.\u00a0 Phytophthora hedraiandra<\/em> was first discovered in 2001 on leaf spots of Viburnum<\/em> sp. in the Netherlands (de Cock & L\u00e9vesque, 2004).<\/p>\n

Hosts<\/em><\/strong>: The full host range of Phytophthora hedraiandra<\/em> is yet not known.\u00a0 Presently, only certain species of Rhododendron<\/em> (azalea) and Viburnum<\/em> are reported as susceptible hosts (CABI, 2014; EPPO, 2014).\u00a0 Fagus sylvatica<\/em> (common beech) is also listed as a host (CABI, 2014; Hejna, et al<\/em>., 2014).\u00a0 According to CDFA Plant Pathology Detection Records (2014-2015), Arctostaphylos<\/em> spp. appears to be a new host for this pathogen.<\/p>\n

Symptoms<\/em><\/strong>:\u00a0 Plant symptoms caused by Phytophthora hedraiandra<\/em> infections may vary with the infected host.\u00a0 Symptoms in Viburnum<\/em> include wilting, leaf spots, stem cankers and root and collar rots, while symptoms in Rhododendron<\/em> include leaf lesions and shoot dieback (Henricot & Waghorn, 2014; Schwingle, et al.<\/em>, 2006, 2007).\u00a0 Symptoms in Fagus sylvatica<\/em> include root rot, leaf chlorosis and wilting (Hejna et al<\/em>., 2014).<\/p>\n

Damage Potential<\/em><\/strong>: Currently, there are no reports on quantitative economic losses in plant production caused by Phytophthora hedraiandra<\/em>. However, infestations may result in significant damage and loss in production and stands of host plants by causing root and collar rots of infected plants. Nursery ornamentals and plants grown in natural ecosystems are particularly affected.\u00a0 In general for Phytophthora<\/em> spp., young seedlings of trees and annual plants may be killed within a few day, weeks or months (Agrios, 2005).<\/p>\n

Disease Cycle<\/em><\/strong>: Generally, species of Phytophthora<\/em> that cause root and stem rots survive cold winters or hot and dry summers as thick-walled, resting spores (oospores and chlamydospores) or mycelium in infected roots, stems or soil.\u00a0 During spring, the oospores and chlamydospores germinate to produce motile spores (zoospores) that swim around in soil water and roots of susceptible hosts. The pathogen infects the host at the soil line causing water soaking and darkening of the trunk bark. This infected area enlarges and may encircle the entire stem of small plants which wilt and eventually die.\u00a0 On large plants and trees, the infected, necrotic area may be on one side of the stem and become a depressed canker below the level of the healthy bark.\u00a0 Collar rot canker may spread down the root system. Roots are invaded at the crown area or at ground level.\u00a0\u00a0 Mycelium and zoospores grow in abundance in cool, wet weather causing damage where the soil is too wet for normal growth of susceptible plants and low temperatures (15-23\u00b0C) prevail (Agrios, 2005).<\/p>\n

Transmission<\/strong><\/em>:\u00a0 Infected soils, plants, nursery and planting stock, seedlings, run-off and splash irrigation and rain water, cultivation equipment and tools that may spread contaminated soil and plant materials to non-infected sites (Yang et al<\/em>., 2012).<\/p>\n

Worldwide Distribution<\/strong><\/span>:\u00a0 Europe<\/em>:\u00a0 Italy, Netherlands, Slovenia, Spain, United Kingdom; North America:<\/em> USA; Oceania<\/em>: Australia.<\/p>\n

In the USA, Phytophthora hedraiandra<\/em> has been found in California, Minnesota, and Virginia (CABI, 2014; EPPO, 2014).<\/p>\n

Official Control<\/strong><\/span>:\u00a0 None reported.<\/p>\n

California Distribution<\/span><\/strong>: \u00a0Alameda, Monterey and San Francisco Counties (see \u2018Initiating Event\u2019).<\/p>\n

California Interceptions<\/strong><\/span>:\u00a0 The pathogen has not been intercepted in quarantine shipments of plants.<\/p>\n

The risk Phytophthora hedraiandra <\/em>would pose to California is evaluated below.<\/p>\n

Consequences of Introduction:\u00a0<\/strong><\/h5>\n

1) \u00a0Climate\/Host Interaction<\/strong>: Evaluate if the pest would have suitable hosts and climate to establish in California. Score:<\/p>\n

– Low (1)<\/strong> Not likely to establish in California; or likely to establish in very limited areas.
\n– Medium (2)<\/strong> may be able to establish in a larger but limited part of California.
\n– High (3)<\/strong> likely to establish a widespread distribution in California.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0Risk is High (3) <\/span><\/em><\/strong>\u2013 <\/em>Phytophthora hedraiandra has already been detected in few nurseries in California.\u00a0 Within California, it is likely to establish in cool, wet climates in susceptible hosts.<\/em><\/p>\n

2) \u00a0Known Pest Host Range<\/strong>: Evaluate the host range of the pest. Score:<\/p>\n

– Low (1)<\/strong> has a very limited host range.<\/span>
\n– Medium (2)<\/strong> has a moderate host range.
\n– High (3)<\/strong> has a wide host range.<\/p>\n

Risk is Low (1)<\/span> <\/em><\/strong>\u2013 The full host range of <\/em>Phytophthora hedraiandra is yet not known.\u00a0 Presently, only certain species of <\/em>Rhododendron (azalea) and <\/em>Viburnum, and <\/em>Fagus sylvatica (common beech) are reported as susceptible hosts. \u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n

3) \u00a0Pest Dispersal Potential<\/strong>: Evaluate the natural and artificial dispersal potential of the pest. Score:<\/p>\n

– Low (1)<\/strong> does not have high reproductive or dispersal potential.
\n– Medium (2)<\/strong> has either high reproductive or dispersal potential.
\n– High (3)<\/strong> has both high reproduction and dispersal potential.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0Risk is High (3) <\/span><\/em><\/strong>\u2013 <\/em>Phytophthora hedraiandra is primarily spread artificially via infested soils, plants, nursery and planting stock, seedlings, run-off and splash irrigation water, cultivation equipment and tools that may spread contaminated soil and plant materials to non-infected sites.<\/em><\/p>\n

4) \u00a0Economic Impact<\/strong>: Evaluate the economic impact of the pest to California using the criteria below. Score:<\/p>\n

A. The pest could lower crop yield.
\nB.The pest could lower crop value (includes increasing crop production costs).
\nC. The pest could trigger the loss of markets (includes quarantines).
\nD. The pest could negatively change normal cultural practices.
\nE. The pest can vector, or is vectored, by another pestiferous organism.
\nF. The organism is injurious or poisonous to agriculturally important animals.
\nG. The organism can interfere with the delivery or supply of water for agricultural uses.<\/p>\n

– Low (1)<\/strong> causes 0 or 1 of these impacts.
\n– Medium (2)<\/strong> causes 2 of these impacts.
\n– High (3)<\/strong> causes 3 or more of these impacts.<\/span><\/p>\n

Risk is High (3)<\/span><\/em><\/strong> \u2013 Although quantitative economic losses in plant production have not reported, the potential for infected plants to result in root and collar rot, canker, leaf lesions and shoot dieback could decrease stands on non-infected plants, increase production costs and cause loss of market of infected\u00a0 nursery stocks. The capability of the pathogen to survive and spread in infected soils and irrigation water could require changes in normal cultivation practices of host plants.<\/em><\/p>\n

5) Environmental Impact:<\/strong> Evaluate the environmental impact of the pest on California using the criteria below.<\/p>\n

A. \u00a0The pest could have a significant environmental impact such as lowering biodiversity, disrupting natural communities, or changing ecosystem processes.
\nB. \u00a0The pest could directly affect threatened or endangered species.
\nC. \u00a0The pest could impact threatened or endangered species by disrupting critical habitats.
\nD. \u00a0The pest could trigger additional official or private treatment programs.
\nE. \u00a0The pest significantly impacts cultural practices, home\/urban gardening or ornamental plantings.<\/p>\n

Score the pest for Environmental Impact. Score:<\/p>\n

– Low (1)<\/strong> causes none of the above to occur.
\n– Medium (2)<\/strong> causes one of the above to occur.<\/span>
\n– High (3)<\/strong> causes two or more of the above to occur.<\/p>\n

Risk is Medium (2)<\/span> <\/em><\/strong>\u2013 Currently, the host range and geographic distribution of <\/em>P. hedraiandra are not fully known.\u00a0 The few known host plants (see \u2018Hosts\u2019 above) can be found in natural ecological habitats as well as in nursery environments.\u00a0 Subsequently, under favorable climate conditions, natural plant communities and ecosystems, as well as home\/urban gardening and ornamentals may be negatively impacted.<\/em><\/p>\n

Consequences of Introduction to California for Phytophthora hedraiandra:<\/em><\/strong><\/h5>\n

Add up the total score and include it here. (Score)<\/p>\n

-Low<\/strong> = 5-8 points
\n-Medium<\/strong> = 9-12 points<\/span>
\n-High<\/strong> = 13-15 points<\/p>\n

Total points obtained on evaluation of consequences of introduction of Phytophthora niederhauserii<\/em> to California = (12)<\/span>.<\/strong><\/p>\n

6) Post Entry Distribution and Survey Information:<\/strong> Evaluate the known distribution in California. Only official records identified by a taxonomic expert and supported by voucher specimens deposited in natural history collections should be considered. Pest incursions that have been eradicated, are under eradication, or have been delimited with no further detections should not be included. (Score)<\/p>\n

-Not established (0)<\/strong> Pest never detected in California, or known only from incursions.
\n-Low (-1)<\/strong> Pest has a localized distribution in California, or is established in one suitable climate\/host area (region).<\/span>
\n-Medium (-2)<\/strong> Pest is widespread in California but not fully established in the endangered area, or pest established in two contiguous suitable climate\/host areas.
\n-High (-3)<\/strong> Pest has fully established in the endangered area, or pest is reported in more than two contiguous or non-contiguous suitable climate\/host areas.<\/p>\n

Evaluation is Low (-1)<\/span>. <\/em><\/strong>To date, <\/em>Phytophthora hedraiandra has been detected in three California coastal counties (Alameda, Monterey and San Francisco Counties) on the same host (<\/em>Arctostaphylos spp.) under similar climate (coastal nurseries).<\/em><\/p>\n

Final Score:<\/h5>\n

7) The final score is the consequences of introduction score minus the post entry distribution and survey information score: (Score)<\/p>\n

Final Score: <\/em><\/strong>\u00a0Score of Consequences of Introduction \u2013 Score of Post Entry Distribution and Survey Information =<\/strong> <\/span>11<\/span>.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

Uncertainty: <\/strong><\/h5>\n

The full host range and in-state distribution of<\/em> Phytophthora hedraiandra is<\/em> not currently known.\u00a0 To date, in California, the pathogen has only been detected from<\/em> Arctostaphylos plants propagated in nurseries<\/em>.\u00a0 Continued<\/em> statewide surveys for <\/em>Phytophthora spp. occurring in nurseries and natural ecosystems (e.g. restoration sites) will contribute to the present knowledge of this pathogen group as well as<\/em> that of<\/em> P. hedraiandra.\u00a0 Consequently, the current proposed rating of<\/em> P. hedraiandra may be affected. \u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n

Conclusion and Rating Justification: <\/strong><\/h5>\n

Based on the evidence provided above the proposed rating for Phytophthora hedraiandra<\/em> is B.<\/strong><\/p>\n

References:<\/strong><\/h5>\n

A<\/strong>grios, G. N.\u00a0 2005.\u00a0 Plant Pathology fifth edition.\u00a0 Elsevier Academic Press, Massachussetts, USA.\u00a0 922 p.<\/p>\n

C<\/strong>ABI.\u00a0 2014.\u00a0 Phytophthora hedraiandra<\/em> datasheet (basic) report.\u00a0 Crop Protection Compendium.\u00a0 www.cabi.org\/cpc\/<\/a><\/p>\n

de<\/strong> Cock A. W. A. M. and C. A. L\u00e9vesque. 2004. New species of Pythium<\/em> and Phytophthora<\/em>. Studies in Mycology 50: 481-487.<\/p>\n

E<\/strong>PPO.\u00a0 2014.\u00a0 Phytophthora hedraiandra<\/em> (PHYTHD).\u00a0 European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization PQR database.\u00a0 http:\/\/www.eppo.int\/DATABASES\/pqr\/pqr.htm<\/a>.<\/p>\n

F<\/strong>arr, D.F., & Rossman, A.Y.\u00a0 2014.\u00a0 Fungal Databases, Systematic Mycology and Microbiology Laboratory, ARS, USDA. Retrieved November 10, 2014, from http:\/\/nt.ars-grin.gov\/fungaldatabases\/ <\/a>.<\/p>\n

H<\/strong>enricot, B. and I. Waghorn.\u00a0 2014.\u00a0 First report of collar and root rot caused by Phytophthora hedraiandra<\/em> on Viburnum<\/em> in the UK.\u00a0 New Disease Reports 29:8. http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.5197\/j.2044-0588.2014.029.008<\/a>.<\/p>\n

H<\/strong>ejna M., K. Cerny, L. Havrdova, and M. Mrazkova.\u00a0 2014.\u00a0 First report of Phytophthora hedraiandra<\/em> causing Rhododendron<\/em> dieback and root rot of Common Beech in the Czech Republic.\u00a0 Plant Disease 98:1,434.2.\u00a0 http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1094\/PDIS-04-14-0339-PDN<\/a><\/p>\n

N<\/strong>APPO.\u00a0 2006.\u00a0 Phytophthora hedraiandra<\/em> de Cock & Man in\u2019t Veld First detection of Phytophthora hedraiandra<\/em> in the United States and North America.\u00a0 North American Plant Protection Organization\u2019s (NAPPO Phytosanitary Alert System): http:\/\/www.pestalert.org\/viewNewsAlert.cfm?naid=4<\/a><\/p>\n

S<\/strong>chwingle, B. W., J. A. Smith and R. A. Blanchette, S. Gould, and B. L. Blanchette.\u00a0 2006.\u00a0 First report of dieback and leaf lesions on Rhododendrons sp. caused by Phytophthora hedraiandra<\/em> in the United States.\u00a0 Plant Disease 90:109. http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1094\/PD-90-0109A<\/a>.<\/p>\n

S<\/strong>chwingle, B. W., J. A. Smith and R. A. Blanchette.\u00a0 2007.\u00a0 Phytophthora<\/em> species associated with diseased woody ornamentals in Minnesota nurseries.\u00a0 Plant Disease 91:97-102.<\/p>\n

Y<\/strong>ang, X. P. A. Richardson, S. R. Ghimire, P. Kong, and C. X. Hong.\u00a0 2012.\u00a0 Phytophthora hedraiandra<\/em> detected from irrigation water at a perennial ornamental plant nursery in Virginia.\u00a0 Plant Disease 96:915.3.\u00a0 http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1094\/PDIS-07-11-0614-PDN<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Responsible Party:<\/h5>\n

Dr. John J. Chitambar, Primary Plant Pathologist\/Nematologist, California Department of Food and Agriculture, 3294 Meadowview Road, Sacramento, CA 95832. Phone: 916-262-1110, plant.health[@]cdfa.ca.gov.<\/p>\n

\n

Pest\u00a0Rating: B<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n

Posted by ls<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

California Pest Rating for Phytophthora hedraiandra de Cock & Man in\u2019t Veld Pest\u00a0Rating: B PEST RATING PROFILE Initiating Event: Recently, Suzanne Latham, CDFA plant pathologist, detected Phytophthora hedraiaindra in Arctostaphylos pumila samples that were collected from a nursery in Monterey County during an inspection related to an earlier detection of P. tentaculata.\u00a0\u00a0 In December 2014, … Continue reading Phytophthora hedraiandra de Cock & Man in\u2019t Veld<\/span> →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1117,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[8,4],"tags":[156,158,41],"class_list":["post-829","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-fungi","category-plant-pathology","tag-fungus","tag-phytophthora-hedraiandra","tag-plant-pathogens"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p5l8vQ-dn","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":7951,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/?p=7951","url_meta":{"origin":829,"position":0},"title":"PHYTOPHTHORA OCCULTANS MAN IN\u2019T VELD AND ROSENDAHL (2015)","author":"Heather.Martin","date":"January 4, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"California Pest Rating for Phytophthora occultans Man In't Veld and Rosendahl (2015)Pest Rating: B DOWNLOAD PEST RATING *NOTE\u00a0 You must be registered and logged in to post a comment. If you have registered and have not received the registration confirmation, please contact us at permits[@]cdfa.ca.gov. Posted by ta","rel":"","context":"In "B-Rated"","block_context":{"text":"B-Rated","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/?cat=670"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1590,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/?p=1590","url_meta":{"origin":829,"position":1},"title":"Phytophthora tentaculata Kr\u00f6ber & Marwitz 1993","author":"Admin","date":"February 29, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"California Pest Rating Proposal for Phytophthora tentaculata Kr\u00f6ber & Marwitz 1993 Pest Rating: B PEST RATING PROFILE Initiating Event:\u00a0 During January 2016, samples of two diseased Diplacus hybrids (monkey flower hybrid varieties) and one of diseased Artemisia palmeri (Palmer sagewort) were collected by Kathleen Kosta, CDFA, from a nursery in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Fungi"","block_context":{"text":"Fungi","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/?cat=8"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":9400,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/?p=9400","url_meta":{"origin":829,"position":2},"title":"Phytophthora rubi (W.F. Wilcox & J.M. Duncan) Man in ‘t Veld 2007 \u2261 Phytophthora fragariae var. rubi W.F. Wilcox & J.M. Duncan 1993 Raspberry root rot","author":"Heather.Martin","date":"January 4, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"California Pest Rating for Phytophthora rubi (W.F. Wilcox & J.M. Duncan) Man in 't Veld 2007 \u2261 Phytophthora fragariae var. rubi W.F. Wilcox & J.M. Duncan 1993 Raspberry root rotPest Rating: B download pest rating *NOTE You must be registered and logged in to post a comment. If you have\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "B-Rated"","block_context":{"text":"B-Rated","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/?cat=670"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":6608,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/?p=6608","url_meta":{"origin":829,"position":3},"title":"Phytophthora ramorum Werres, De Cock & Man in ‘t Veld 2001","author":"Heather.Martin","date":"November 15, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"California Pest Rating for Phtophthora ramorum Werres, De Cock & Man in 't Veld 2001Pest Rating: A download pest rating *NOTE: You must be registered and logged in to post a comment. If you have registered and have not received the registration confirmation, please contact us at permits[@]cdfa.ca.gov. Posted by\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "A-Rated"","block_context":{"text":"A-Rated","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/?cat=669"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":3162,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/?p=3162","url_meta":{"origin":829,"position":4},"title":"Phytophthora parvispora Scanu & Denman, 2013","author":"Admin","date":"January 9, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"California Pest Rating for Phytophthora parvispora \u00a0Scanu & Denman, 2013 Pest Rating: B\u00a0 PEST RATING PROFILE Initiating Event:\u00a0 On August 19, 2016, non-official samples of pear baits of effluent collected from the bottom of four pots containing diseased Mexican orange blossom (Choisya ternata) plants, were sent by a private company\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Fungi"","block_context":{"text":"Fungi","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/?cat=8"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1006,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/?p=1006","url_meta":{"origin":829,"position":5},"title":"Phytophthora siskiyouensis Reeser & E. M. Hansen, 2008","author":"Admin","date":"June 1, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"California Pest Rating for Phytophthora siskiyouensis Reeser & E. M. Hansen, 2008 Pest Rating: B PEST RATING PROFILE Initiating Event: \u00a0 In October 2014, Suzanne Latham, CDFA plant pathologist detected the oomycete, Phytophthora siskiyouensis which was isolated from a diseased alder tree with a bleeding trunk canker in Mill Valley,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Fungi"","block_context":{"text":"Fungi","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/?cat=8"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/829","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1117"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=829"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/829\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10470,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/829\/revisions\/10470"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=829"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=829"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=829"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}