{"id":2764,"date":"2016-10-26T15:07:23","date_gmt":"2016-10-26T22:07:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/?p=2764"},"modified":"2024-04-26T11:02:46","modified_gmt":"2024-04-26T18:02:46","slug":"pseudocercospora-myrticola-speg-deighton-1976","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/?p=2764","title":{"rendered":"Pseudocercospora myrticola (Speg.) Deighton 1976"},"content":{"rendered":"
California Pest Rating for<\/strong><\/h5>\n
Pseudocercospora myrticola <\/em><\/strong>(Speg.) Deighton 1976<\/strong><\/h5>\n
Pest Rating: B<\/strong><\/h5>\n
\n
PEST RATING PROFILE<\/strong><\/h5>\n
Initiating Event:<\/strong><\/h5>\n

None.\u00a0 The risk of infestation of P. myrticola <\/em>in California is evaluated and a permanent rating is herein proposed.<\/p>\n

History & Status:<\/strong><\/h5>\n

Background<\/u><\/strong>:\u00a0 Pseudocercospora myrticola<\/em> is a fungal plant pathogen that belongs to a larger group of Cercospora<\/em>-like fungi most of which cause leaf spot symptoms in host plants. The pathogen was originally named Cercospora myrticola<\/em>, and since then has also been known by several synonyms: Cercospora myrti, C. saccardoana, C. amadelpha<\/em> and Fusariella cladosporioides<\/em> (Crous et al.,<\/em> 2013; Farr & Rossman, 2016).\u00a0 \u00a0The pathogen is widely distributed globally and infects myrtle and several species within the family Myrtaceae, with few in Melastomataceae (Farr & Rossman, 2016). In the USA, P. myrticola<\/em> has only been reported from myrtle (Myrtus communis<\/em>).\u00a0 In 1984, P. myrticola<\/em> was first reported in the USA from Florida (Alfieri et al<\/em>., 1984) and from San Diego, California in 2006 (CPPDR, 2007).\u00a0 On December 4, 2013, the pathogen was detected in a decorative wreath comprising of symptomatic leaves of an unknown plant, most likely to be myrtle that had been shipped from the State of Nevada and intercepted in Sonoma County, California.<\/p>\n

Disease cycle<\/u><\/strong>: Infected plants produce conidiophores (specialized hypha) that arise from the plant surface in clusters through stomata and form conidia (asexual spores) successively.\u00a0 Conidia are easily detached and blown by wind often over long distances.\u00a0 On landing on surfaces of a plant host, conidia require water or heavy dew to germinate and penetrate the host.\u00a0 Sub-stomatal stroma (compact mycelial structure) may form from which conidiophores develop.\u00a0 Development of the pathogen is favored by high temperatures and the disease is most destructive during summer months and warmer climates.\u00a0 High relative humidity is necessary for conidial germination and plant infection.\u00a0 The pathogen can overwinter in or on seed and as mycelium (stromata) in old infected leaves (Agrios, 2005). \u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n

Dispersal and spread<\/em>: air-currents, infected nursery plants, infected leaves, seeds.<\/p>\n

Hosts:<\/em> Blepharocalyx divaricatus<\/em>, Metrosideros excela <\/em>(New Zealand Christmas tree), M. parkinsonii <\/em>(Parkinson\u2019s rata), Monochaetum polyneurum<\/em>, Myrciaria cauliflora<\/em> (jaboticaba), Myrtus communis <\/em>(common myrtle), M. communis <\/em>var. latifolia<\/em>, M. communis <\/em>var. laurifolia<\/em>, M. divaricata<\/em>, Tristania<\/em> suaveolens<\/em> (swamp mahogany) (Farr & Rossman, 2016).<\/p>\n

Symptoms<\/em>: \u00a0Infected host plants exhibit irregular to angular, leaf spots on both leaf surfaces.\u00a0 Spots are 2-4 mm in diameter, rusty-brown, abundant on the lower leaf surface, usually confluent. \u00a0Lesions or spots may be surrounded by a diffuse lighter halo (Nakashima et al<\/em>., 2004).<\/p>\n

Damage Potential: <\/em>Specific losses due to Pseudocercospora myrticola <\/em>have not been reported.\u00a0 Photosynthetic area can be reduced due to leaf spotting.\u00a0 In severe infections, leaf wilt and drop may be expected.\u00a0 However, damage potential due to this pathogen is likely to be similar to other Cercospora<\/em> diseases which is usually low (Agrios, 2005).\u00a0 In California, myrtle is not native to California and is grown in lower coastal and some inner valley regions of the State (Calflora, 2016) in landscapes, commercial and private gardens.\u00a0 Also, young branches and foliage are used in floral decorations and therefore, diseased plants could be of particular concern to production nurseries.<\/p>\n

Worldwide Distribution<\/u>:<\/strong> Africa<\/em>: South Africa, Cape Province; Asia<\/em>:\u00a0 India, Japan; Europe<\/em>: Cyprus, England, Republic of Georgia, Germany, Greece, Israel, Italy, Sicily, Scotland, Sweden, Yugoslavia; North America<\/em>: USA (Florida, California); South America<\/em>: Brazil, Chile, Paraguay; Oceania<\/em>: Australia, New Zealand (Crous et al<\/em>., 2013;\u00a0 Farr & Rossman, 2016).<\/p>\n

Official Control<\/u>:<\/strong> None reported.\u00a0 Presently, Pseudocercospora myrticola<\/em> has a temporary \u2018Q\u2019 rating in California.<\/p>\n

California Distribution<\/u>:<\/strong> Pseudocercospora myrticola <\/em>has been found in San Diego Counties (CDFA Plant Pest and Damage Records).<\/p>\n

California Interceptions<\/u>:\u00a0<\/strong> Pseudocercospora myrticola<\/em> was detected in 2013 in an intercepted quarantine shipment of a plant wreath that originated in Nevada.<\/p>\n

The risk Pseudocercospora myrticola<\/em> would pose to California is evaluated below.<\/p>\n

Consequences of Introduction:\u00a0 <\/strong><\/h5>\n

1) Climate\/Host Interaction:<\/strong> Evaluate if the pest would have suitable hosts and climate to establish in California. Score:<\/p>\n

– Low (1) Not likely to establish in California; or likely to establish in very limited areas.<\/p>\n

– Medium (2)<\/strong> may be able to establish in a larger but limited part of California.<\/span><\/p>\n

– High (3) likely to establish a widespread distribution in California.<\/p>\n

Risk is Medium (2): <\/em><\/strong>Pseudocercospora myrticola may be able to establish wherever myrtle and other hosts plants are able to grow.\u00a0 Myrtle is a non-native plant in California and is grown in lower coastal and some inner valley regions in warm and humid climates.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

2) Known Pest Host Range:<\/strong> Evaluate the host range of the pest. Score:<\/p>\n

– Low (1) has a very limited host range.<\/p>\n

– Medium (2) has a moderate host range.<\/span><\/p>\n

– High (3) has a wide host range.<\/p>\n

Risk is Medium (2):\u00a0 <\/em><\/strong>Pseudocercospora myrticola has a moderate host range that comprises common myrtle and other species within Myrtaceae, plus few species in Melastomataceae.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

3) Pest Dispersal Potential:<\/strong> Evaluate the natural and artificial dispersal potential of the pest. Score:<\/p>\n

– Low (1) does not have high reproductive or dispersal potential.<\/p>\n

– Medium (2) has either high reproductive or dispersal potential.<\/p>\n

– High (3)<\/strong> has both high reproduction and dispersal potential.<\/span><\/p>\n

Risk is High (3):\u00a0 <\/em><\/strong>Pseudocercospora myrticola has high reproductive potential resulting in the successive production of conidia which are dependent on air currents and infected plants and seed for dispersal and spread.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

4) Economic Impact:<\/strong> Evaluate the economic impact of the pest to California using the criteria below. Score:<\/p>\n

A. The pest could lower crop yield.<\/p>\n

B. The pest could lower crop value (includes increasing crop production costs).<\/p>\n

C. The pest could trigger the loss of markets (includes quarantines).<\/p>\n

D. The pest could negatively change normal cultural practices.<\/p>\n

E. The pest can vector, or is vectored, by another pestiferous organism.<\/p>\n

F. The organism is injurious or poisonous to agriculturally important animals.<\/p>\n

G. The organism can interfere with the delivery or supply of water for agricultural uses.<\/p>\n

– Low (1) causes 0 or 1 of these impacts.<\/p>\n

– Medium (2) causes 2 of these impacts.<\/p>\n

– High (3) causes 3 or more of these impacts.<\/p>\n

Risk is Medium (2):\u00a0 <\/em><\/strong>Infected host plants with leaf spot symptoms could lower value of nursery-produced plants and trigger the loss of markets.<\/em><\/p>\n

5) Environmental Impact:<\/strong> Evaluate the environmental impact of the pest on California using the criteria below.<\/p>\n

A. The pest could have a significant environmental impact such as lowering biodiversity, disrupting natural communities, or changing ecosystem processes.<\/p>\n

B. The pest could directly affect threatened or endangered species.<\/p>\n

C. The pest could impact threatened or endangered species by disrupting critical habitats.<\/p>\n

D. The pest could trigger additional official or private treatment programs.<\/p>\n

E. The pest significantly impacts cultural practices, home\/urban gardening or ornamental plantings.<\/p>\n

Score the pest for Environmental Impact. Score:<\/p>\n

– Low (1) causes none of the above to occur.<\/p>\n

– Medium (2)<\/strong> causes one of the above to occur.<\/span><\/p>\n

– High (3) causes two or more of the above to occur.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/strong>Risk is <\/em><\/strong>Medium<\/em><\/strong> (2): <\/em><\/strong>Pseudocercospora myrticola infections could significantly impact home\/urban gardening and aesthetic plantings of myrtle in commercial environments, such as parks and public gardens. <\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

Consequences of Introduction to California for Pseudocercospora myrticola<\/em>:<\/strong><\/h5>\n

Add up the total score and include it here. (Score)<\/p>\n

-Low = 5-8 points<\/p>\n

–Medium<\/strong> = 9-12 points<\/span><\/p>\n

-High = 13-15 points<\/p>\n

Total points obtained on evaluation of consequences of introduction to California = 11<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

6) Post Entry Distribution and Survey Information:<\/strong> Evaluate the known distribution in California. Only official records identified by a taxonomic expert and supported by voucher specimens deposited in natural history collections should be considered. Pest incursions that have been eradicated, are under eradication, or have been delimited with no further detections should not be included. (Score)<\/p>\n

-Not established (0) Pest never detected in California, or known only from incursions.<\/p>\n

–Low (-1)<\/strong> Pest has a localized distribution in California, or is established in one suitable climate\/host area (region).<\/span><\/p>\n

-Medium (-2) Pest is widespread in California but not fully established in the endangered area, or pest established in two contiguous suitable climate\/host areas.<\/p>\n

-High (-3) Pest has fully established in the endangered area, or pest is reported in more than two contiguous or non-contiguous suitable climate\/host areas.<\/p>\n

Evaluation is Low (-1): <\/em><\/strong>Pseudocercospora myrticola has been found in San Diego County only.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

Final Score:<\/h5>\n

7) The final score is<\/strong> the consequences of introduction score minus the post entry distribution and survey information score: (Score)<\/p>\n

Final Score: <\/em><\/strong>\u00a0Score of Consequences of Introduction \u2013 Score of Post Entry Distribution and Survey Information = 10<\/strong><\/span><\/em><\/p>\n

Uncertainty: \u00a0<\/strong><\/h5>\n

None.<\/p>\n

Conclusion and Rating Justification: <\/strong><\/h5>\n

Based on the evidence provided above the proposed rating for Pseudocercospora myrticola<\/em> is B.<\/strong><\/p>\n

References:<\/strong><\/h5>\n

A<\/strong>grios, G. N.\u00a0 2005.\u00a0 Plant Pathology (Fifth Edition).\u00a0 Elsevier Academic Press, USA.\u00a0 922 p.<\/p>\n

Alfieri Jr., S. A., K. R. Langdon, C. Wehlburg, and J. W. Kimbrough.<\/strong> \u00a01984. \u00a0Index of Plant Diseases in Florida (Revised). Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Service, Division of Plant Industry Bulletin 11: 1-389.\u00a0 In<\/em> [Farr, D. F.\u00a0 & A. Y. Rossman, 2016. Fungal Databases, Systematic Mycology and Microbiology Laboratory, ARS, USDA.\u00a0 Retrieved October 19, 2016, from http:\/\/nt.ars-grin.gov\/fungaldatabases\/<\/a> ].<\/p>\n

Crous, P.W., U. Braun, G. C. Hunter, M. J. Wingfield, G. J. M. Verkley, H. D. Shin, C. Nakashima, and J. Z. Groenewald. <\/strong>\u00a0<\/strong>2013. \u00a0Phylogenetic lineages in Pseudocercospora<\/em><\/strong><\/strong>. Studies in Mycology 75: 37-114.<\/p>\n

C<\/strong>alflora.\u00a0 2016.\u00a0 Information on California plants for education, research and conservation. [Web application].\u00a0 Berkeley, California: The Calflora Database [a non-profit organization]. http:\/\/www.calflora.org\/<\/a><\/p>\n

C<\/strong>PPDR.\u00a0 2007.\u00a0 Plant pathology A & Q rated pathogen & hosts detected by county.\u00a0 California Plant Pest & Disease Report, California Department of Food and Agriculture July 2005 through December 2006 23(1): 113-115.<\/p>\n

F<\/strong>arr, D.F., & A. Y. Rossman. \u00a02016.\u00a0 Fungal Databases, Systematic Mycology and Microbiology Laboratory, ARS, USDA. \u00a0Retrieved October 19, 2016, from http:\/\/nt.ars-grin.gov\/fungaldatabases\/<\/a>.<\/p>\n

N<\/strong>akashima, C., H. Horie, and T. Kobayashi.\u00a0 2004.\u00a0 Addition and reexamination of Japanese species belonging to the genus Cercospora<\/em> and allied genera.\u00a0 VI. Four Pseudocercospora<\/em> species from Ohshima Island, Tokyo.\u00a0 Mycoscience 45: 49-55.\u00a0 DOI 10.1007\/s10267-003-0151-y<\/p>\n

Responsible Party:<\/strong><\/h5>\n

John J. Chitambar, Primary Plant Pathologist\/Nematologist, California Department of Food and Agriculture, 3294 Meadowview Road, Sacramento, CA 95832. Phone: 916-262-1110, plant.health[@]cdfa.ca.gov.<\/p>\n

\n
Comment Format:<\/h5>\n

\u2666 \u00a0Comments should refer to the appropriate California Pest Rating Proposal Form subsection(s)\u00a0being commented on, as shown below.<\/p>\n

Example Comment:\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Consequences of Introduction: \u00a01. Climate\/Host Interaction:\u00a0[Your comment that relates to \u201cClimate\/Host Interaction\u201d here.<\/em>]<\/p>\n

\u2666 \u00a0Posted comments will not be able to be viewed immediately.<\/p>\n

\u2666 \u00a0Comments may not be posted if they:<\/p>\n

Contain inappropriate language which is not germane to\u00a0the pest rating proposal;<\/p>\n

Contains defamatory, false, inaccurate, abusive, obscene, pornographic,\u00a0sexually oriented, threatening, racially offensive, discriminatory or illegal\u00a0material;<\/p>\n

Violates agency regulations prohibiting sexual harassment or other forms\u00a0of discrimination;<\/p>\n

Violates agency regulations prohibiting workplace violence, including threats.<\/p>\n

\u2666 \u00a0Comments may be edited prior to posting to ensure they are entirely germane.<\/p>\n

\u2666 \u00a0Posted comments shall be those which have been approved in content and posted to the\u00a0website to be viewed, not just submitted.<\/p>\n

\n

Pest Rating: B<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n

Posted by ls<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

California Pest Rating for Pseudocercospora myrticola (Speg.) Deighton 1976 Pest Rating: B PEST RATING PROFILE Initiating Event: None.\u00a0 The risk of infestation of P. myrticola in California is evaluated and a permanent rating is herein proposed. History & Status: Background:\u00a0 Pseudocercospora myrticola is a fungal plant pathogen that belongs to a larger group of Cercospora-like … Continue reading Pseudocercospora myrticola (Speg.) Deighton 1976<\/span> →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1117,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[8,4],"tags":[46,41,433],"class_list":["post-2764","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-fungi","category-plant-pathology","tag-fungi-2","tag-plant-pathogens","tag-pseudocercospora-myrticola"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p5l8vQ-IA","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":8734,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/?p=8734","url_meta":{"origin":2764,"position":0},"title":"Pseudocercospora fuligena (Roldan) Deighton 1976 Black leaf mold","author":"Heather.Martin","date":"August 10, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"California Pest Rating for Pseudocercospora fuligena (Roldan) Deighton 1976 Black leaf moldPest Rating: A DOWNLOAD PEST RATING *NOTE You must be registered and logged in to post a comment. If you have registered and have not received the registration confirmation, please contact us at permits[@]cdfa.ca.gov. Posted by ta","rel":"","context":"In "A-Rated"","block_context":{"text":"A-Rated","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/?cat=669"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":2963,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/?p=2963","url_meta":{"origin":2764,"position":1},"title":"Pseudocercospora purpurea (Cooke) Deighton 1976","author":"Admin","date":"November 30, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"California Pest Rating for Pseudocercospora purpurea (Cooke) Deighton 1976 Pest Rating: B PEST RATING PROFILE Initiating Event: On November 17, 2016, USDA APHIS PPQ inquired if CDFA had conducted a pest risk assessment of the fungal pathogen, Pseudocercospora purpurea on avocados in California.\u00a0 Subsequently, the risk of infestation of P.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Fungi"","block_context":{"text":"Fungi","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/?cat=8"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":2425,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/?p=2425","url_meta":{"origin":2764,"position":2},"title":"Pseudocercospora smilacicola U. Braun, 2014","author":"Admin","date":"August 10, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"California Pest Rating for Pseudocercospora smilacicola U. Braun, 2014 Pest Rating:\u00a0B PEST RATING PROFILE Initiating Event: On July 21, 2016, a shipment of lance leaf greenbrier (Smilax sp.) plants from Texas, destined to a wholesale plant company in Santa Barbara, was intercepted by the Santa Barbara County officials.\u00a0 Diseased plants\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Fungi"","block_context":{"text":"Fungi","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/?cat=8"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":5128,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/?p=5128","url_meta":{"origin":2764,"position":3},"title":"Pseudocercospora theae","author":"Admin","date":"April 6, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"California Pest Rating for Pseudocercospora theae (Cavara) Deighton 1987 Pest Rating: C \u00a0 PEST RATING PROFILE Initiating Event:\u00a0 On March 6, 2018, the USDA APHIS PPQ requested State Regulatory Officials to review PPQ\u2019s consideration of deregulation of the pathogen, Pseudocercospora theae at US ports of entry.\u00a0 A \u2018Deregulation evaluation of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "C-Rated"","block_context":{"text":"C-Rated","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/?cat=671"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":5779,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/?p=5779","url_meta":{"origin":2764,"position":4},"title":"Cercospora insulana Sacc. 1915","author":"Admin","date":"September 13, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"California Pest Rating for Cercospora insulana Sacc. 1915 Pest Rating: C PEST RATING PROFILE Initiating Event:\u00a0 On May 11, 2018 a postal shipment of statice dried flowers showing symptoms of leaf spots was intercepted by the CDFA at a Federal Express (FedEx) office.\u00a0 The shipment was destined to a private\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "C-Rated"","block_context":{"text":"C-Rated","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/?cat=671"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":2677,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/?p=2677","url_meta":{"origin":2764,"position":5},"title":"Cercospora coniogrammes Crous & R. G. Shivas 2012","author":"Admin","date":"October 3, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"California Pest Rating for Cercospora coniogrammes Crous & R. G. Shivas 2012 Pest\u00a0Rating: B PEST RATING PROFILE Initiating Event: On June 14, 2016, a shipment of silver lady fern (Blechnum gibbum) plants from Florida, destined to a nursery in Nippomo, San Luis Obispo County, was intercepted by San Luis County\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Fungi"","block_context":{"text":"Fungi","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/?cat=8"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2764","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1117"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2764"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2764\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10529,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2764\/revisions\/10529"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2764"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2764"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2764"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}