{"id":1277,"date":"2015-11-13T14:46:07","date_gmt":"2015-11-13T22:46:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/?p=1277"},"modified":"2024-04-26T11:17:20","modified_gmt":"2024-04-26T18:17:20","slug":"bamboo-mosaic-virus-bamv","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/?p=1277","title":{"rendered":"Bamboo Mosaic Virus (BaMV)"},"content":{"rendered":"
California Pest Rating for\u00a0<\/strong><\/h5>\n
Bamboo Mosaic Virus <\/em><\/strong>(BaMV)<\/strong><\/h5>\n
Pest Rating: \u00a0B<\/h5>\n
\n
PEST RATING PROFILE<\/strong><\/h5>\n
Initiating Event:\u00a0 <\/strong><\/h5>\n

None.<\/p>\n

History & Status:<\/strong><\/h5>\n

Background<\/u><\/strong>:\u00a0 Bamboo mosaic virus<\/em> was originally isolated from two species of bamboo, Bambusa multiplex<\/em> and B. vulgaris<\/em>, in Brasilia, Brazil and reported as a new virus as well as the first virus identified infecting bamboo plants.\u00a0 No evidence of spread in Brazil was observed outside the original site. (Lin et al.,<\/em> 1977).\u00a0 Since then, the virus pathogen has also been reported from the Pacific islands, Taiwan, Australia, the Philippines, and the USA.\u00a0 In the USA, Bamboo mosaic virus<\/em> was first reported from San Diego, California, in Beechey bamboo plants growing in the San Diego Zoo (Lin et al<\/em>., 1995).\u00a0 During April 2014, BaMV was detected in bamboo growing in San Diego Botanic Garden.\u00a0 This detection was made by the CDFA Plant Pathology Laboratory.\u00a0\u00a0 The pathogen is reported to have been tentatively diagnosed in a Bambusa<\/em> sp. sample in Florida during the 1980s, although bamboo enthusiasts in Florida claim to have observed virus-like symptoms in the collections prior to the 1980s (Elliott & Zettler, 1996). The pathogen has also been reported from Hawaii in B. vulgaris<\/em> (Nelson & Borth, 2011).<\/p>\n

Bamboo mosaic virus<\/em> is a plant pathogenic virus in the genus Potexvirus<\/em> within the family Potexvirus.<\/p>\n

Hosts<\/strong>: Bamboo is the natural host.\u00a0 Ten species of bamboo are included namely, Bambusa beecheyana, B. beecheyana cv. pubescens, B. edulis, B. multiplex, B. oldhamii, B. vulgaris, B.vulgaris var. striata, Dendrocalamus latiflorus, D. latiflorus <\/em>cv. \u2018<\/em>Mei-nung\u2019, Phyllostachys nigra. <\/em>\u00a0Experimental susceptible plants include Gomphrena globosa, Chenopodium amaranticolor, Bambusa vulgaris<\/em> \u2018Vittata\u2019, and Dendrocalamus latiflorus<\/em> cv. \u2018Mei-nung\u2019<\/em> (Brunt et al.,<\/em> 1996 onwards).<\/p>\n

Symptoms<\/strong>: Bamboo mosaic virus<\/em>-infected bamboo plants may exhibit chlorotic mosaic and mottling patterns running parallel to the leaf veins, necrotic streaks on shoots and culms, vascular discoloration, aborted stems and death of plants.\u00a0 Symptoms may be mild or subtle in some infected plants (Brunt et al.<\/em>, 1996; Nelson & Borth, 2011).<\/p>\n

Damage Potential<\/strong>:\u00a0 Bamboo mosaic virus<\/em> can affect growth and stand of infected bamboo plants.\u00a0 While quantitative crop loss values have not been reported, the pathogen has the potential to cause losses in production and is considered a threat to the bamboo industry in Taiwan (Lin et al.,<\/em> 1993). \u00a0In California, mainly nursery, private and commercial cultivations of bamboo in public parks, landscapes, and gardens are at risk of reductions in healthy stands if infected with BaMV.\u00a0 Furthermore, once established, the disease cannot be eradicated without destroying infected plants (Nelson & Borth, 2011).<\/p>\n

Transmission<\/strong>: Bamboo mosaic virus<\/em> is mechanically transmitted to non-infected bamboo cultivars.\u00a0 Contaminated cultivation tools and infected BaMV bamboo plants are a means for spreading the virus.\u00a0 Transmission does not involve an insect vector.<\/p>\n

Worldwide Distribution<\/u>:<\/strong> \u00a0Asia<\/em>: Philippines, Taiwan; North America<\/em>: USA; South America<\/em>: Brazil; Australia<\/em>: Queensland, Western Australia (Brunt et al., 1996 onwards; Dodman & Thomas, 1999; Elliot & Zettler, 1996; Lin et al<\/em>., 1977; Lin et al<\/em>., 1993, 1995)<\/p>\n

Official Control<\/u>:<\/strong> Bamboo mosaic virus<\/em> is on the \u2018Harmful Organism List\u2019 for Costa Rica, French Polynesia, Georgia, India, Japan, and New Zealand (PCIT, 2015).\u00a0 Currently, BaMV has a temporary Q rating in California.<\/p>\n

California Distribution<\/u>:<\/strong> San Diego, San Diego County.<\/p>\n

California Interceptions<\/u>:\u00a0<\/strong> There are no records of BaMV detected in incoming plant shipments to California.<\/p>\n

The risk Bamboo mosaic virus<\/em> would pose to California is evaluated below.<\/p>\n

Consequences of Introduction:\u00a0 <\/strong><\/h5>\n

1) Climate\/Host Interaction:<\/strong> Evaluate if the pest would have suitable hosts and climate to establish in California. Score:<\/p>\n

– Low (1) Not likely to establish in California; or likely to establish in very limited areas.<\/p>\n

– Medium (2)<\/strong> may be able to establish in a larger but limited part of California.<\/span><\/p>\n

– High (3) likely to establish a widespread distribution in California.<\/p>\n

Risk is Medium (2)<\/em><\/strong> \u2013 Bamboo mosaic virus is likely to establish within California wherever bamboo is grown in southern and northern regions of the State.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

2) Known Pest Host Range:<\/strong> Evaluate the host range of the pest. Score:<\/p>\n

– Low (1)<\/strong> has a very limited host range.<\/span><\/p>\n

– Medium (2) has a moderate host range.<\/p>\n

– High (3) has a wide host range.<\/p>\n

Risk is Low (1) <\/em><\/strong>\u2013 The host range is limited to bamboo \u2013 the natural host. Ten species of bamboo are included namely, Bambusa beecheyana, B. beecheyana cv. pubescens, B. edulis, B. multiplex, B. oldhamii, B. vulgaris, B.vulgaris var. striata, Dendrocalamus latiflorus, D. latiflorus <\/em>cv. \u2018<\/em>Mei-nung\u2019, Phyllostachys nigra.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

3) Pest Dispersal Potential:<\/strong> Evaluate the natural and artificial dispersal potential of the pest. Score:<\/p>\n

– Low (1) does not have high reproductive or dispersal potential.<\/p>\n

– Medium (2)<\/strong> has either high reproductive or dispersal potential.<\/span><\/p>\n

– High (3) has both high reproduction and dispersal potential.<\/p>\n

Risk is Medium (2) <\/em><\/strong>\u2013 Bamboo mosaic virus increases rapidly within infected bamboo plants and can be spread to new non-infected sites through movement of infected plants.\u00a0 The virus is also mechanically transmitted through infected cultivation tools such as those used in pruning.\u00a0 It is not spread by an insect or other biological vector.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

4) Economic Impact:<\/strong> Evaluate the economic impact of the pest to California using the criteria below. Score:<\/p>\n

A. \u00a0The pest could lower crop yield.<\/p>\n

B. \u00a0The pest could lower crop value (includes increasing crop production costs).<\/p>\n

C. \u00a0The pest could trigger the loss of markets (includes quarantines).<\/p>\n

D. \u00a0The pest could negatively change normal cultural practices.<\/p>\n

E. \u00a0The pest can vector, or is vectored, by another pestiferous organism.<\/p>\n

F. \u00a0The organism is injurious or poisonous to agriculturally important animals.<\/p>\n

G. \u00a0The organism can interfere with the delivery or supply of water for agricultural uses.<\/p>\n

– Low (1) causes 0 or 1 of these impacts.<\/p>\n

– Medium (2) causes 2 of these impacts.<\/p>\n

– High (3)<\/strong> causes 3 or more of these impacts.<\/span><\/p>\n

Risk is High (3)<\/em><\/strong> \u2013 Infections by <\/em>Bamboo mosaic virus could lower crop yield and value, increase production costs due to removal and replacement of diseased plants, and trigger loss of domestic and international markets.\u00a0 In particular, nurseries could be negatively affected by losses in production and sale.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

5) Environmental Impact:<\/strong> Evaluate the environmental impact of the pest on California using the criteria below.<\/p>\n

A. \u00a0The pest could have a significant environmental impact such as lowering biodiversity, disrupting natural communities, or changing ecosystem processes.<\/p>\n

B. \u00a0The pest could directly affect threatened or endangered species.<\/p>\n

C. \u00a0The pest could impact threatened or endangered species by disrupting critical habitats.<\/p>\n

D. \u00a0The pest could trigger additional official or private treatment programs.<\/p>\n

E. \u00a0The pest significantly impacts cultural practices, home\/urban gardening or ornamental plantings.<\/p>\n

Score the pest for Environmental Impact. Score:<\/p>\n

– Low (1) causes none of the above to occur.<\/p>\n

– Medium (2)<\/strong> causes one of the above to occur.<\/span><\/p>\n

– High (3) causes two or more of the above to occur.<\/p>\n

Risk is <\/em><\/strong>Medium (2)<\/em><\/strong> \u2013 In California, bamboo is mainly grown in<\/em> specialty <\/em>nurseries, public parks, landscapes, and garden environments.\u00a0 Healthy bamboo stands in such environments could be significantly impacted if infected with<\/em> Bamboo mosaic virus.<\/span><\/p>\n

Consequences of Introduction to California for Bamboo mosaic virus<\/em><\/strong><\/h5>\n

Add up the total score and include it here. (Score)<\/p>\n

-Low = 5-8 points<\/p>\n

-Medium<\/strong> = 9-12 points<\/span><\/p>\n

-High = 13-15 points<\/p>\n

Total points obtained on evaluation of consequences of introduction of BaMV to California = (10).<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

6) Post Entry Distribution and Survey Information:<\/strong> Evaluate the known distribution in California. Only official records identified by a taxonomic expert and supported by voucher specimens deposited in natural history collections should be considered. Pest incursions that have been eradicated, are under eradication, or have been delimited with no further detections should not be included. (Score)<\/p>\n

-Not established (0) Pest never detected in California, or known only from incursions.<\/p>\n

-Low (-1)<\/strong> Pest has a localized distribution in California, or is established in one suitable climate\/host area (region).<\/span><\/p>\n

-Medium (-2) Pest is widespread in California but not fully established in the endangered area, or pest established in two contiguous suitable climate\/host areas.<\/p>\n

-High (-3) Pest has fully established in the endangered area, or pest is reported in more than two contiguous or non-contiguous suitable climate\/host areas.<\/p>\n

Evaluation is Low (-1).\u00a0 <\/em><\/strong>Presently, <\/em>Bamboo mosaic virus is established in San Diego, California. \u00a0<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

Final Score:<\/h5>\n

7) The final score is<\/strong> the consequences of introduction score minus the post entry distribution and survey information score: (Score)<\/p>\n

Final Score: <\/em><\/strong><\/span>\u00a0<\/span>Score of Consequences of Introduction \u2013 Score of Post Entry Distribution and Survey Information = 9<\/span>.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

Uncertainty: <\/strong><\/h5>\n

None.<\/p>\n

Conclusion and Rating Justification: <\/strong><\/h5>\n

Based on the evidence provided above the proposed rating for Bamboo mosaic virus<\/em> is B.<\/strong><\/p>\n

References:<\/strong><\/h5>\n

B<\/strong>runt, A.A., K. Crabtree, M. J. Dallwitz, A. J. Gibbs, L.Watson, and E. J. Zurcher (eds.)<\/a>. (1996 onwards). `Plant Viruses Online: Descriptions and Lists from the VIDE Database. Version: 20th<\/sup> August 1996.’ URL http:\/\/biology.anu.edu.au\/Groups\/MES\/vide\/.<\/a><\/p>\n

C<\/strong>ABI.\u00a0 2015.\u00a0 Bamboo mosaic virus<\/em> datasheet (basic). Crop Protection Compendium.\u00a0 http:\/\/www.cabi.org\/cpc\/datasheet\/1695<\/a>.<\/p>\n

D<\/strong>odman, R.L., and J. E. Thomas. 1999. The first record of Bamboo mosaic potexvirus<\/em> from Australia. Australasian Plant Pathology 28:337\u2013<\/strong>337.<\/p>\n

E<\/strong>lliot, M.S., and F. W. Zettler. 1996. Bamboo mosaic virus<\/em> detected in ornamental bamboo species in Florida.\u00a0 Proceedings of the Florida State Horticultural Society 109:24\u2013<\/strong>25.<\/p>\n

L<\/strong>in, M. T., E. W. Kitajima, F. P. Cupertino, and C. L. Costa.\u00a0 1977.\u00a0 Partial purification and some properties of Bamboo mosaic virus<\/em>.\u00a0 Phytopathology 67:1439-1443.<\/p>\n

L<\/strong>in, N. -S., Y.-J. Chai, T. -Y. Chang, and Y. -H. Hsu.\u00a0 1993.\u00a0 Incidence of Bamboo mosaic potexvirus<\/em> in Taiwan.\u00a0 Plant Disease 77:448-450.<\/p>\n

L<\/strong>in, N. \u2013S., B. \u2013Y. Lin, T. \u2013Y. Yeh, and Y. -H. Hsu.\u00a0 1995.\u00a0 First report of Bamboo mosaic virus<\/em> and its associated satellite RNA on bamboo in the U. S.\u00a0 Plant Disease 79 (12):1249.<\/p>\n

N<\/strong>elson, S., and W. Borth.\u00a0 Bamboo Mosaic.\u00a0 2011.\u00a0 College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources University of Hawai\u2019i at M\u0101noa, Plant Disease September 2011 PD-76.<\/p>\n

P<\/strong>CIT.\u00a0 2014.\u00a0 USDA Phytosanitary Certificate Issuance & Tracking System.\u00a0 https:\/\/pcit.aphis.usda.gov\/PExD\/faces\/ReportHarmOrgs.jsp<\/a> .<\/p>\n

F<\/strong>azzio, D.\u00a0 2015.\u00a0 Bamboo.\u00a0 Sonoma County Master Gardeners University of California.\u00a0 http:\/\/ucanr.edu\/sites\/scmg\/Plant_of_the_Month\/Bamboo\/#<\/a> .<\/p>\n

Responsible Party:<\/strong><\/h5>\n

John J. Chitambar, Primary Plant Pathologist\/Nematologist, California Department of Food and Agriculture, 3294 Meadowview Road, Sacramento, CA 95832. Phone: 916-262-1110, plant.health[@]cdfa.ca.gov.<\/p>\n

\n

Pest Rating: \u00a0B<\/h3>\n
\n

Posted by ls<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

California Pest Rating for\u00a0 Bamboo Mosaic Virus (BaMV) Pest Rating: \u00a0B PEST RATING PROFILE Initiating Event:\u00a0 None. History & Status: Background:\u00a0 Bamboo mosaic virus was originally isolated from two species of bamboo, Bambusa multiplex and B. vulgaris, in Brasilia, Brazil and reported as a new virus as well as the first virus identified infecting bamboo … Continue reading Bamboo Mosaic Virus (BaMV)<\/span> →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1117,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[4,39],"tags":[219,45,154],"class_list":["post-1277","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-plant-pathology","category-viruses-and-viroids","tag-bamboo-mosaic-virus","tag-plant-pathogen","tag-virus"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p5l8vQ-kB","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":1183,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/?p=1183","url_meta":{"origin":1277,"position":0},"title":"Tomato Mottle Mosaic Virus (ToMMV)","author":"Admin","date":"October 12, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"California Pest Rating for Tomato Mottle Mosaic Virus (ToMMV) Pest Rating: B PEST RATING PROFILE Initiating Event:\u00a0 On September 17, 2015, the CDFA was notified by a seed company of the detection of Tomato mottle mosaic virus (ToMMV) in tomatoes grown at the company\u2019s farm in San Joaquin County.\u00a0 Subsequently,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Plant Pathogens"","block_context":{"text":"Plant Pathogens","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/?cat=4"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":2226,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/?p=2226","url_meta":{"origin":1277,"position":1},"title":"Freesia Mosaic Virus","author":"Admin","date":"June 29, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"California Pest Rating for Freesia Mosaic Virus Pest Rating: B PEST RATING PROFILE Initiating Event: On March 21, 2016, two samples of diseased Lilium sp. (lily) plants exhibiting leaf spots, were collected from a nursery in San Luis Obispo County, during a regulatory nursery inspection by San Luis Obispo County\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Plant Pathogens"","block_context":{"text":"Plant Pathogens","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/?cat=4"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":732,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/?p=732","url_meta":{"origin":1277,"position":2},"title":"Pepino Mosaic Virus (PepMV)","author":"Admin","date":"April 7, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"California Pest Rating for Pepino Mosaic Virus (PepMV) Pest\u00a0Rating: B PEST RATING PROFILE Initiating Event:\u00a0 In January 2015, Tongyan Tian, CDFA Plant Pathologist, detected Pepino mosaic virus(PepMV) in two official tomato samples collected from plants grown in a greenhouse in San Diego County.\u00a0 The virus has been previously reported by\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Plant Pathogens"","block_context":{"text":"Plant Pathogens","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/?cat=4"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":827,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/?p=827","url_meta":{"origin":1277,"position":3},"title":"Pea Seed-borne Mosaic Virus (PSbMV)","author":"Admin","date":"April 9, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"California Pest Rating for Pea Seed-borne Mosaic Virus (PSbMV) Pest\u00a0Rating: B PEST RATING PROFILE Initiating Event:\u00a0 There is no initiating event.\u00a0 The risk of infestation of Pea seed-borne mosaic virus in California is evaluated and a permanent rating is proposed. History & Status: Background: In 1966 a virus disease of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Plant Pathogens"","block_context":{"text":"Plant Pathogens","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/?cat=4"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":4314,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/?p=4314","url_meta":{"origin":1277,"position":4},"title":"Cucumber Green Mottle Mosaic Virus","author":"Admin","date":"January 4, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0California Pest Rating for Cucumber Green Mottle Mosaic Virus Pest Rating: A PEST RATING PROFILE Initiating Event: \u00a0 On December 15, 2017, Cucumber green mottle mosaic virus (CGMMV) was detected in a watermelon seed sample submitted by the USDA to the CDFA Plant Pathology Lab, and collected from a seed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Plant Pathogens"","block_context":{"text":"Plant Pathogens","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/?cat=4"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":736,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/?p=736","url_meta":{"origin":1277,"position":5},"title":"Kweilingia divina (Syd.) Buritic\u00e1 1998","author":"Admin","date":"April 7, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"California Pest Rating for Kweilingia divina (Syd.) Buritic\u00e1 1998 Pest\u00a0Rating: A PEST RATING PROFILE Initiating Event:\u00a0 In December 2014, Kweilingia divina was detected in a quarantine interception of bamboo leaves showing symptoms of rust, imported from Florida to California.\u00a0 The detection was made by Contra Costa Agricultural Commissioner\u2019s office inspector\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Fungi"","block_context":{"text":"Fungi","link":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/?cat=8"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1277","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1117"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1277"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1277\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":12043,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1277\/revisions\/12043"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1277"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1277"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.cdfa.ca.gov\/Section3162\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1277"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}